State of Florida Department of Transportation logo
Florida Department of

TRANSPORTATION

I-75 at SR-820 (Pines Boulevard)

Download the Final Study (PDF, 34.9MB)

Executive Summary

The primary purpose of this Interchange Modification Report (IMR) is to update the analysis conducted as part of the 2012 PD&E Study for I-75 (SR-93) from Palmetto Expressway (SR-826) to I-595 (SR-862) and develop a concept that includes a Park & Ride (P&R) facility while maintaining or improving the traffic operations LOS of the 2012 PD&E Preferred Alternative. The 2012 PD&E developed six alternatives that included a P&R facility on the southeast quadrant of the intersection. However, these alternatives could not achieve adequate LOS D or better at the SR-93 (I-75) NB Ramp Terminal intersection with SR-820 (Pines Boulevard); Therefore, the 2012 PD&E Preferred Alternative did not include a P&R facility.

It is in the national interest to preserve and enhance the Interstate System to meet the needs of the 21st Century by assuring that it provides the highest level of service in terms of safety and mobility. Full control of access along the Interstate mainline and ramps, along with control of access on the crossroad at interchanges, is critical to providing such service. Therefore, the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) decision to approve new or revised access points to the Interstate System under Title 23, United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 111, must be supported by substantiated information justifying and documenting that decision.

Purpose and Need

Download the Purpose and Need (PDF, 142.2KB)

The 2012 PD&E developed six alternatives that included a P&R facility on the southeast quadrant of the intersection. However, none of these alternatives achieved adequate LOS at the SR-93 (I-75) NB Ramp Terminal intersection with SR-820 (Pines Boulevard); hence, the PD&E Preferred Alternative did not include a P&R facility. Consequently, the primary need of this IMR is to develop a concept that includes a P&R facility while maintaining or improving the traffic operations LOS of the PD&E Preferred Alternative.

Recommended Alternative

Download the Recommended Alternative (PDF, 3.3MB)

Please see the attached recommended alternative

Travel Time Savings

Network-wide Comparison Design Year 2045 No-Build Alternative Design Year 2045 Enhanced Build Alternative Difference
Total Delay (hrs) AM Peak 355 336 -5%
PM Peak 447 413 -8%
Total Travel Time (hrs) AM Peak 578 533 -8%
PM Peak 682 612 -10%
Average Speed (mph) AM Peak 16 16 0%
PM Peak 14 14 0%


Safety Benefits

Download the Safety Benefits (PDF, 182.3KB)

Please see the attached safety report for more information.